Understanding is a bit of an iceberg concept, right? AI's 'understanding' is just the tip, mimicking human interaction. The submerged part, with all the complexities and subtleties of real emotional intelligence, that's beyond AI. Artificial understanding vs human understanding is a little like comparing shadows to the real object they're …

It's an intriguing concept but the real charm of this subreddit is the human element. The spontaneity, the emotions, the unpredictability. AI may reduce errors but I can't imagine a machine replicating the depth of human imagination in what-ifs.