From an investor's perspective, co-founders suggest stability and diverse skill sets. But solo founders can succeed too, if they fill skill gaps with advisors or early hires. Ultimately, it depends on you and the specific needs of your startup.

Yeah, go solo, brilliant idea. Who needs someone to remind you that your favorite idea sucks? Kidding, but really, think about how you handle feedback and teamwork. Can be a make-or-break thing.

I've been through this. A co-founder can be crucial if they complement your skills. You don't want two people good at marketing but no one to code, right? Also, think about venture capitalists and investors; some prefer to back teams over individuals. Think strategically about your needs.

Not trying to be negative, but have you really thought about the risk of burnout? Having a co-founder means somebody to fall back on and share that load. But it's all about personal choice in the end. 🤷‍♂️

Tbh, having a co-founder isn’t just about skills; it's about moral support. You need someone to share the highs and lows. Conflicts happen, but if you find the right partner with a similar vision, it's worth it.

Nah, don't buy into the hype. Plenty of solo founders out there. Sure, a co-founder can share the workload, but they also share the reward and your vision might get diluted. If you have the drive and skills, go solo! 🚀

I felt this! I’m struggling with the same thoughts. Seems like everyone says co-founders are a must, but it’s so hard to find someone who fits. Still trying to figure out if I can do this alone.