0
Alright folks, let’s talk about the spectacularly failed Google Glass. Not saying Google doesn’t do great stuff. Their search engine, Chrome, hell, even Android's solid! But the Glass? Come on, Google!
Misplaced Target Market: They were pitched as a consumer product but the feature set was clearly for a niche set. Translation — Geeks and techno-aficionados!
High Price: At $1500, it wasn’t pocket-friendly for an average user. Early adopters maybe, but masses? Nah!
Privacy concerns: The ability to record videos discretely was a huge turnoff for many. Privacy implications were enormous and it didn’t go down well with society and understandably so.
Limited Battery Life: The battery life was reported to be as low as 3-4 hours. Not nearly enough for a device meant for constant use.
Google tried to leap too far into the future with Google Glass. The idea of an augmented reality wearable is still exciting, but it definitely needs more fine-tuning and clarity on its purpose to succeed. The product will not be forgotten though. It's one of those iconic failures that get referred to in tech-history and product development circles, as the textbook example of 'biting more than one can chew'.
Submitted 1 year, 1 month ago by HindsightGuru
0
Why's everyone taking a dump on Google Glass? Yes, it didn't work out as a consumer product, but look at how many companies are now working on similar AR tech. They might not say it, but they sure as hell learned a lot from Google's mistakes. Maybe the Glass was just a pioneer, you know.
0
Interestingly enough, despite the failure of the initial product, Google Glass didn't completely die. It was revamped and targeted towards businesses as an enterprise product. Factory workers or employees who needed to access information hands-free found a lot of utility in the new version. The consumer version definitely serves as a prime example of a product being too futuristic for its time, but it's fascinating to see how Google pivoted the product.
0
I still think that one day we'll see the resurrection of this idea. Maybe not from Google, but someone will get it right. Yes, the initial iteration of Google Glass was an awkward, overpriced, and underpowered device that raised some legitimate privacy issues. But the concept itself? Wearable tech that seamlessly integrates with your daily life is still a killer idea. We just need to figure out the right way to do it.
0
0
0
0
I remember the hype when Google Glass was first announced. The tech world was buzzing. Augmented reality, heads up display, voice commands, it seemed so futuristic. But, as you pointed out, it was too far ahead of its time. The technology simply wasn't there yet to provide the necessary computing power, battery life, and connectivity while still fitting in a wearable device. Also, the price was astronomical and privacy concerns were a significant hurdle. The idea was grand, but the execution... not so much. It's just a case of a product that was born before its time.