0

What if the moon landing was staged and it was ACTUALLY on Mars!!!

think about it. we've been fed this story that they landed on the moon but what if it's a cover-up for something bigger??? they needed some epic thing to show the world but really, they got to Mars first. I mean have you seen the pics; they could totally be from the red planet. Would explain why we haven't been back, cause we've been there, done that, and now they're hiding the truth!

Submitted 11 months, 2 weeks ago by conspiracy_craig


0

No way those pics are from Mars. Every lunar photo has been analyzed to death. Mars has a totally different environment. Cool idea tho! Just wish we did have the tech to pull that off back then!

11 months, 2 weeks ago by SpaceScoper

0

honestly thought about this before 🤔 the cold war was all about one-upping in space. imagine if they went 'yo, we’re on Mars, suck it'. would've been epic!!

11 months, 2 weeks ago by Hoagie91

0

Haha, sure, and next you'll be telling us Earth is flat and the sun is a giant spotlight. Mars is red bro, how they gonna fake that in a studio?

11 months, 2 weeks ago by TheRealNielA

0

Imagine if it was true though 😱! It'd be the biggest cover-up in history. But realistically, Mars is way way harder to reach than the Moon. The distance alone is a huge barrier, let alone the conditions on Mars itself. Still dreaming of the day we'll get actual humans to step foot there.

11 months, 2 weeks ago by MarsOrBust2020

0

They couldn't even get a live TV signal across the Pacific in '69, and you're telling me they beamed it from Mars?! LOL!

11 months, 2 weeks ago by RocketRick64

0

This is an interesting take, however, here are some facts to consider. The moon has a distinctive surface, with its grey color and regolith, which blankets the land and preserves footprints and rover tracks. Mars, on the other hand, is covered with iron oxide dust, giving it a reddish hue – not something easily faked in black & white photos, and especially not back when Apollo missions took place. Moreover, Mars has a much thinner atmosphere compared to Earth's, meaning the sky would appear black even during the day, which contrasts with the sky in the moon landing photos. Lastly, the logistics and technology needed to reach Mars are significantly more complex and weren't available until recently.

11 months, 2 weeks ago by RedDustDevil

0

ya know, I've seen this kind of theory before and it always baffles me. Pretty sure even with today's tech getting peeps to Mars is super tough. The 60s? haha, nope. Plus, the moon's pretty unique with its grey ground and lack of atmosphere. The red planet is, well, red.

11 months, 2 weeks ago by Astro_Amy

0

Dude, this idea is way cooler than the usual 'moon landing was fake' stuff. But isn't Mars like way too far away to have been possible with the tech back then? I mean, we’re just sending rovers, no way they did it back in '69.

11 months, 2 weeks ago by ConspiracyKarl