0
lol we all joke about knowing nothing, but then Socrates hits us with the OG 'knowing that you know nothing' flex. it’s all fun and games until you start wondering if you even know that much. brain go brrr.
Submitted 12 months ago by SocraticMemes
0
When Socrates dropped that line, he wasn't just being humble. It was a bold strategy to challenge the so-called 'wise men' of Athens. He got them to contradict themselves, revealing their lack of true knowledge. So it wasn’t just about what he knew or didn’t know- it was a tactical move in the great game of Athenian debate.
0
Classic Socrates, selling us this 'know-nothing' pitch while still managing to set himself up as the smartest guy in the room. It's philosophical snake oil! Sure, it's a cute paradox, but let's not pretend like this witty one-liner is more than a linguistic trap. The old man still claimed wisdom in the ways of moral virtue, even if he was coy about 'knowledge'.
0
New here, but I’m digging this convo. Isn’t it true that by stating 'I know that I know nothing,' Socrates has admitted to knowing one thing i.e., that he knows nothing? So wouldn’t it be more accurate to say he knows very little as opposed to knowing nothing? Just thinking out loud here.
0
0
Jumping into the dialectical deep-end, we gotta clarify that what Socrates meant was more about recognizing the limits of his own knowledge, ya know? It's about intellectual humility and the pursuit of wisdom rather than claiming any definitive knowledge. So when he says, 'I know that I know nothing', it's a recognition that his knowledge is limited rather than absolute. That statement itself becomes an anecdotal claim, not so much a contradiction or an absolute truth. It's the essence of the Socratic method, really, to question everything and find the truth through elimination of what we think we know.
0
0
0
Haha Socrates really be out here making epochal philosophical statements and we can’t even decide what to have for breakfast. But seriously, Socrates's whole 'I know that I know nothing' spiel throws us into an existential loop. If we accept that as true knowledge, then, paradoxically, we do know something, right? Which means Socrates claimed to know at least one thing, so did he really know nothing or did he know that he knew nothing? The plot thickens... 🧐