Using game theory to fix politics is a gamified approach that could resonate with a lot of people. I mean, look how popular Among Us got, and that’s all about strategy and reading other players. Could gamifying debates get more people interested in politics? Maybe we’re on to something...

It's a nice idea, but realistically politics is too messy for clean game theory solutions. There are too many variables, spillover effects, and illogical behaviors influenced by emotions and partisan loyalties.

I'm all for a revamp of debate strategies, but it's easier said than done. Voters need to value the constructive dialogue for it to impact the politicians' approach. It's our job to demand better. If we keep cheering for the 'zingers' and soundbites, nothing's really gonna change, game theory or not.

Game theorist here. Political debates can definitely benefit from well-designed rulesets incentivizing constructive dialogue. For instance, we could analyze debates as repeated games where building a reputation for fair play and consistency results in long-term benefits. But this requires a shift in how voters respond to debate tactics—rewarding substance over showmanship.

lol as if politicians wanna understand each other. they just want the power, mate.

That's actually a pretty cool idea, applying game theory to politics. Never thought of it like that before.

Game theory in political debates sounds good in theory, but might be tough in practice. Incentives in politics are pretty screwed up - politicians wanna 'win' more than they wanna find common ground. Setting rules that align their interests with public good could work, maybe? Make them lose something if they go off-topic or start attacking without substance.

Interesting take! I think game theory could def help structure political debates for mutual benefit. Could be cool to see strategies that focus on collaboration rather than just competition. Like incorporating the concept of Nash equilibrium where no player has anything to gain by changing their own strategy. It’d encourage dialogue that seeks common ground.