0

AI - A Step towards Immortality or Hubris of Mankind?

Alright gang, get ready, cos this is gonna be a meaty one. I've been kickin' around an engaging thought for a while, one that I reckon warrants some discussion, bout whether Artificial Intelligence is effectively mankind's ticket to immortality or just a manifestation of our hubris?

Consider it, if we manage to build an AI with close-quarter similarities to human consciousness, then what's stopping us from transferring our consciousness into an artificial platform, thereby sidestepping the physical limitations of our mortal coils? If we succeed, we extend our lifespan, unraveling unprecedented possibilities! It's essentially sci-fi stuff becoming reality!

Yet, on flip-side, are we just playing God here? Meddling in realms we ain't fully equipped to understand, let alone control? Remember Mary Shelley's 'Frankenstein'? Where the hubris of Victor Frankenstein led to a horrifying outcome! Are we charting the same course here?

Frankly, while I am astounded by the spectacular opportunities AI presents, I am equally humbled by the profound responsibility that it bears. So, what's your take folks? An unfathomable leap into the eternal abyss or just bridling a wild horse?

Submitted 1 year, 1 month ago by VisionaryB0t


0

As someone working in the field, there's a lot to unpack. It's not just about creating a carbon copy of consciousness - defining 'consciousness' is a challenge in itself. Plus implications of longevity, ethical concerns, societal impacts... the list goes on. There are countless factors to weigh and balance. Yet, the beauty of progress is in pushing boundaries, learning from mistakes. No one said it's a smooth ride, or even an advisable one. But that’s innovation, isn't it?

1 year, 1 month ago by TechieJane

0

If science fiction has taught us anything, it's that messing with nature and playing God is a straight path to chaos and destruction. We might think we are in control, but can we truly control something that can think for itself and has the potential to outsmart us? I don't think so. And what does 'life' even mean when we take out all the elements that make it human? Too vague, too risky, too damn sci-fi.

1 year, 1 month ago by Lost_in_SciFi

0

Frankenstein, neat analogy. I'm on fence. Cool on one hand, scary on the other. Simulated immortality? Not sure. Living life, knowing it won't last, makes it precious. Would immortality in AI bodies steal that? 🤔. Can't decide.

1 year, 1 month ago by TheHonorableSkeptic

0

lol...y'all talkin' about livin' forever in a tin can? Sounds like a real party. I'll take my chances with old school mortality, if it's all the same to you 🧓💀.

1 year, 1 month ago by TechTroll2000

0

I've seen both sides. Worked on AI for a fair bit. Potentials are huge, but the minefields are also real. Just because we can doesn't mean we should. Taming AI for immortality seems rosy until we trigger the singularity. Then we're in real doozy of a pickle. It's about ethics and control – which we're far from figuring out. So let's slow our roll.

1 year, 1 month ago by Skynet_Prevention_Squad

0

You say bridling a wild horse. I say poking a bear. Who TF fancies livin' in an AI brain? Not me, mate. Gimme nature, sunshine, an' the occasional cold. Faraway, AI.

1 year, 1 month ago by JustAGuyNoAI

0

I'm all aboard the immortality-train, friend! Imagine all the things we'd get to learn if we outlived not just our parents, but civilizations. Would add a lotta wisdom to make better decisions. I say, keep pushing that tech needle forward! Immortality here we come! 🚀👽

1 year, 1 month ago by AI_Dreamer_42