Iteration based on feedback is where it's at. We tried a big rule shift once, and it bombed so hard. But we really worked with our users, even set up a temp Discord to hash it out. Was messy but worth it. People need to feel heard, and the rules got sharper 'cause of it.

Rules? I thrive in anarchy. It's the internet, stop trying to box everyone in with your 'clear and enforceable' stuff. But hey, you do you, I'll be watching when it all goes down in flames. ;)

Right on. You'd think it's common sense, but so many mods try to make one-size-fits-all rules. Has to be a living document. What works now might be a disaster in a month. And the enforcing part - hate to say it, but you need a dedicated team or things slip through the cracks. AI bots can help but not always. Remember, folks, mods are volunteers too.

Great post. I can't emphasize enough the importance of a hierarchical structure. Too many times, mods are forced to treat minor infractions like major ones due to poor planning. Also, document your mod actions for transparency and so you can track which rules might need tweaking.

lol clear and specific? good luck with that, every rule I've ever seen gets argued to death. Someone always wants to be the exception. 😂

As a new mod, appreciate the guide. Clarity's def key. Just curious, any advice on handling existing rules that are vague? We've been hesitant to do a major overhaul since we don't want to alienate our long-time members.

A hierarchy of rules sounds smart. I've seen too many subs where everything is a bannable offense. Like, chill, not everything is the end of the world.

You're hitting the nail on the head with user feedback. Biggest mistake I see is mods making rules in a vacuum. Gotta remember the community is why the sub exists, if they don't buy in you've got nothin'. Also, enforcement has to be consistent or you're just asking for a riot.